|
Controversy
and Neha Dhupia seem synonymous! When Neha debuted in Harry
Baweja's Qayamat, she hit headlines! Much ado was made about
her two- piece bikini scene a la Bo Derek. And her alleged
link up with costar with Ajay Devgan only provided fodder
to the gossip mills. Neha Dhupia is in the news once again.
This time, it is the controversial film Julie. Needless to
say, Neha for the first time is enacting a role of a prostitute.
The bare dare scenes notwithstanding! To play safe, the director
Deepak Shivdasani even stipulated in the contract that the
story called for some bold scenes and did not want to face
any music later by the artiste to which Neha willingly agreed.
After all, what mattered was the central role. To get the
controversies cleared straight from the horse's mouth, we
corner Neha for a one on one.
What
was the after effect of playing a character like Julie?
That of turmoil, disturbance and emotional upheaval! While
shooting, several times I thought what if something like this
happened to me. Shooting continuously for months, I had to
literally shake myself out of the character. It took its toll
on me.
Did the character stay with you even after you had finished
shooting for the film?
Yes! I'm not a switch-on switch-off artiste! Julie remained
with me for a long time even after the shooting of the film
was over. I could still feel her pain. I still sympathize
with her about what she went through in life. Here, I would
like to narrate an incident that happened recently. Though
I'm a Sikh, whenever I pass by a church I draw a cross. And
I gained this habit ever since I began shooting for Julie
because it is she who does that whenever she passes by a church
in the film. This, after 50 days of completion of the shooting
for the film!
Is
it true that director Deepak Shivdasani made you sign a contract
stipulating that the film had bold scenes in them so that
you wouldn't create any brouhaha later?
Yes it's true! Let me also mention that Deepak Shivdasani
has not made me do anything more than what was mentioned in
the contract. He has kept to his word. He has been a thorough
professional. Though the film revolves around a prostitute,
there isn't much of skin show. The bold scenes will not titillate
you. The audience will feel sorry for her. It will actually
make them think, "What this poor woman had to go through!"
There was no need for any body doubles. I was aware of what
I did on the sets. See Julie is just a story of an innocent
woman who lands up into prostitution.
After
Julie… there's Rakht, right?
Yes! Both the films have shaped out to be pretty good. Of
course, my role in Julie is meatier. I'm content with both
films. I'm also content with the way my career is progressing.
There are stories that you did not actually get along with
Bipasha Basu and Amrita Arora while shooting for Rakht?
Where did you hear this? Or did you read it? (laughs) I just
finished a schedule withBipasha
and Amrita and there was no awkwardness on the sets. We were
thorough professionals. Also, ever since I have begun shooting
for Julie and Rakht, I have practically had no time to read
all the rubbish that is written about me. I feel any kind
of publicity, whether good or bad, helps. Chalo, at least
people feel that I'm worth being talked about. Also if there
are critical reports about me, there are also reports that
write good about me. So it gets balanced. |